Intelligence analysis skills and it’s Relation With the Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments among the Officers and members of the Directorate of Intelligence and Combat-Terrorism
Abstract
The following Research Aims Identify to:
1- Intelligence analysis skills among the Officers and members of the Directorate of Intelligence and Combat-Terrorism.
2- The Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments among the Officers and members of the Directorate of Intelligence and Combat-Terrorism.
3- The correlation between intelligence analysis skills and the Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments among the Officers and members of the Directorate of Intelligence and Combat-Terrorism according to the military rank..
This research restricted on Intelligence analysis skills and it’s Relation With the Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments among the Officers and members of the Directorate of Intelligence and Combat-Terrorism. The sample is consisted of (224) Officers and members. For achieving aims, the main instruments of this research were two scales for Intelligence analysis skills and the Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments. The researcher has applied the two instruments, it is applied to the subjects on a sample and making use of statistic package of social sciences (SPSS) and (Microsoft-Excel) program, the findings were as follows:
1- The subjects of sample have Intelligence analysis skills.
2- Officers are more overconfidence in their contingent judgment than members, that the difference were with statistical indication at (0.05) indication level, for each local confidence and Global confidence.
3-.There are no correlation between Intelligence analysis skills and the Overconfidence in Contingent Judgments.
Depending on these results , the researcher states some recommendations and suggestions.
References
8) Briony D. Pulford (1996): overconfidence in human judgment, Department of Psychology, University of Leicester, U.K.
9) Christina E. Wells (2006): CIA v. Sims: Mosaic Theory and Government Attitude, University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository.
10) Darci Klein, Arielle Cunningham, & Erin M. Buchanan (2018): How Metacognitive Awareness Relates to Overconfidence in Interval Judgments, International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities, Volume 10.
11) David E. Pozen (2005): The Mosaic Theory, National Security, and the Freedom of Information Act, the yale law journal.
12) David T. Moore (2018): Species of Competencies for Intelligence Analysis, Advanced Analysis Lab, National Security Agency, U.S.A.
13) Henry Prunckun (2015): First principles of intelligence analysis: the orising a model for secret research, Salus Journal, Issue 3, Number 1.
14) Heuer, Richards J. (1999): Psychology of intelligence analysis, Central Intelligence Agency.
15) Isabela Baleeiro Curado (2015): overconfidence and confirmation bias: Are future managers vulnerable? Sao Paulo, Brazil.
16) Koltuksuz & Tekir (2006): Intelligence Analysis Modeling, International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology.
17) Mandel, D. R., Karvetski, C. W., & Dhami, M. K. (2018): Boosting intelligence.
18) Matus Grezo, (2020): Overconfidence and financial decision-making: a meta-analysis, Slovak Academy of Sciences, researchgate.
19) Moore, David T. & Krizan L. (2001): Intelligence Analysis: Does NSA Have What it Takes. Reprint. Cryptologic Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.2: 1-33.
20) Robert Paul Singh (2020): Overconfidence: A common psychological attribute of entrepreneurs which leads to firm failure, New England Journal of Entrepreneurship.
21) Vitanova, Ivana (2019): Nurturing overconfidence: The relationship between leader power, overconfidence and firm performance, The Leadership Quarterly.
22) William Millward, (1993): Life in and out of Hut 3, in F. H. Hinsley and Alan Stripp, Codebreakers: The Inside Story of Bletchley Park, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23) Ying Wang, Xin Shi, & Dong Xu(2020): Relationship between Overconfidence and Risky Behavior among Ship Crew, National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah as publisher of the journal.
2. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc. , will be allowed only with a written permission from Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah.
3. Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS) , University of Al-Qadisiyah, the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the journal Al-Qadisiyah Journal of Humanities scinces (QJHS), University of Al-Qadisiyah are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
