The Representations of Ideology in the Front Covers of Selected Iraqi Children Magazines: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis

  • Asst. Prof. May Ali Abdul-Ameer .

Abstract

No matter how simple a text might look in addressing young readers, still it is not free from ideology. Ideologies are socially shared systems of beliefs that are systematic, intentional, and controlled by the domination and power of a group within a particular society. Ideologies can not only be represented by verbal modes of communication but even by other kinds of semiotic modes such as visual images. Consequently, the following study tries to explore the way ideology could be represented  through visual images in the front covers of AL-Mizmar, an Iraqi children magazine, during two highly disturbing periods of the Iraqi socio-political ruling state history, the 1970s and 1980s. The researcher argues that the way visual images used in the front covers of Al-Mizmar magazine reflects an explicit representation of the ideology adopted by the ruling state. What is more, it is also argued that there is a more drastic shift in ideology representation observed in the use of visual images in Al-Mizmar front covers throughout the 1970s than it is the case in the 1980. It is found that this shift is due to the foundational changes of interest and power of the Iraqi ruling state at the period under consideration. The analysis of the data revealed rather interesting and likely crucial findings that assert the researcher's initial arguments regarding the controversial relation that holds between political ideology and media in its visual mode. 

References

Clark, R.J. (1995). Developing critical reading practicing. Prospect,10, 65-80.
Cook, G. (2001). Discourse of Advertising. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dixon, B (1987). Catching Them Young. Routledge: New York.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction: Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 258-284). London: Sage Publication.
Gee, J. P. (2004). An Introduction to Human Language: Fundamental Concepts in Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hollindale, P. (1990). Signs of Childness in children Books. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jewitt, C. (2009). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. (2011). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed). London: Routledge.

Ledin and Machin (2015) Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
Machin, D. ( 2007). Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.
McIntyre, D. & Busee, B. (2010). Language and Style.UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis. Bloomsbury publishing: Great Britian.
Stephens, J. (1992). Language and ideology in children fiction. London, England: Longman
Threadgold, T. (1990). Talking about genre: Ideologies and incompatible discourse. Cultural Studies, 3,101-27
Van Dijk T A (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary study. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia Linguistica, 35 (2),11-40.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 459-460.
Wodak, Ruth. 2011. The Discourse of Politics in Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
Published
2022-06-10
How to Cite
., A. P. M. A. A.-A. (2022). The Representations of Ideology in the Front Covers of Selected Iraqi Children Magazines: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis. Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities Sciences, 25(2-2), 146-164. Retrieved from https://journalart.qu.edu.iq/index.php/QJHS/article/view/529
Section
Articles