The effect of imaginative writing strategy in developing creative thinking in third year secondary students in history

  • م.م فاطمة عطية
  • م.م سناء عبد الأمير
Keywords: Imaginative writing strategy, creative thinking

Abstract

The research aimed to identify (The effect of the imaginative writing strategy in developing creative thinking skills among third-year intermediate school students in history). The two researchers chose an experimental design with partial control, and two academic sections of the school were randomly selected, one of which was for the experimental group, section (B), with a ratio of (30) One female student, and the other was a control group, Division (A), with (30) female students. The two researchers conducted parity between the female students of the two research groups in several variables, namely (chronological age calculated in months, grades in the history subject for the previous academic year 2023-2024 AD, intelligence level, and the pre-creative thinking test). The two researchers relied on The Torrance test for creative thinking prepared by Khairallah (1981). The psychometric properties were extracted from the tool’s validity and reliability. The researchers used appropriate statistical methods, including the t-test for two independent samples to process the data. The results of the study showed the superiority of the experimental group in the creative thinking test over the control group. The researchers recommended With several recommendations, including relying on the imaginative writing strategy in teaching social subjects at different academic levels, and suggestions for future studies

 

References

• خير الله , سيد محمد (1981). اختبار القدرة على التفكير الإبداعي , بحوث في علم النفس , دار النهضة العربية , بيروت .
• دناوي , مؤيد اسعد حسين (2008). تطوير مهارات التفكير الإبداعي , ط1, عالم الكتب للنشر والتوزيع , عمان , الأردن .
• سرايا , عادل(2007). تكنولوجيا التعليم المفرد وتنمية الابتكار , ط1 , دار وائل للنشر والتوزيع , عمان , الأردن , .
• عودة ، احمد سليمان، خليل يوسف الخليلي (1988). الإحصاء للباحث في التربية والعلوم الإنسانية ، ط1 ، دار الفكر للنشر والتوزيع , عمان , الأردن .
• الكبيسي ،عبد الواحد حميد (2007). القياس والتقويم تجديدات ومناقشات ، دار جرير للنشر والتوزيع ،عمان، الأردن.
• المعايطة , عبد العزيز عطا الله ، عبد اللطيف بن حمد الحلبي (2005). مقدمة في أصول التربية , ط1, مكتبة الفلاح للنشر والتوزيع , الكويت .

• Alisa, T. Peby & Rosa, R Noor(2013). R.A.F.T as a Strategy for Teaching Writing Functional Text to Junior High School Students.
• Allan, Janet & Landaker, Christine (2005). Reading History: A Practical Guide to Improving Literacy.
• Buehl, Doug(2014). Classroom Strtegies for Interactive Learning. New York: International Reading Association.
• Cakraverty, A. & Gautum K.( 2000) Dynamic of Writing.
• Doubet, Kristina J. & Hockett, Jessica A. (2015). Differentiate in Middle and High School: Strategies to Engage All Learners.
• Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: Quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149.
• Hosseinpour, Nafiseh (2014). Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Through Task-BasedCollaboration. Available online
• Jacobs, H., Zinkgraf, S., Wormuth, D., Hartfiel, V., & Hughey, J. (1981). Composition: A Practical Approach. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
• Jeong, H., Jeong, Y., & Song, J. (2004). An analysis of writing by 11th grade students on the theme of light according to the type of task. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(5), 1008-1017.
• Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using science writing heuristic (SWH) in middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
• Owens, C. V. (2000). Teachers’ responses to science writing. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry, 15(1), 22-35.
• Parilasanti, Ni Made Elis. 2014. The effect of RAFT Strategy and Anxiety upon Writing Competency of The Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 3 Mengwi in Academic Year 2013/2014. Denpasar: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
• Park, J.-Y., & Shin, Y.-J. (2007). Analysis of the types of science writing based on the scientific thinking abilities in science worksheet attached to elementary science textbook.Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 99-112.
• Phelps (2001) The Power of Strategy Instruction. Available at ninchy.org.research/ee/learningstrategies.
• Pratiwi ,YoesisIka(2016).The use of RAFT strategy in teaching writiing procedure text at the second grade of SMAN 3 BANDAR LAMPUNG , FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION LAMPUNG UNIVERSITY S-1 Degree at EESP,inEnglish Education Study Program ,The Language and Arts Education Department of Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
• Quellmalz, Edys S. and Burry, James (1983). Analytic Scales for Assessing Students’ Expository and Narrative Writing Skills. Los Angeles: UCLA Graduate School of Education.
• Son, J.-W. (2006). A science writing teaching method based on scientific thinking. The Journal of Curriculum & Evaluation, 9(2), 333-355.
• Yang,Chanho,Lee,Jaewon,Noh,Taehee(2014).An Exploratory Investigation of the Imaginative Writing Processes of Middle School Students ,Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(5), 511-521.
Published
2024-05-19
How to Cite
عطيةم. ف., & عبد الأميرم. س. (2024). The effect of imaginative writing strategy in developing creative thinking in third year secondary students in history. Al-Qadisiyah Journal For Humanities Sciences, 27(1), 877 - 898. Retrieved from https://journalart.qu.edu.iq/index.php/QJHS/article/view/801